On 15 Apr 2008, at 19:11, Nathan Weizenbaum wrote:
> Hmm... actually, I do prefer = and +. + makes more sense for insertion > anyway. > > Getting mixins to work through includes would definitely be a plus. Here's the patch to do both of these then: http://pastie.org/181614 This time including documentation. g --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
