Could you split this up into two patches? I try to keep to one-change one-commit in the repo.
Garry Hill wrote: > On 15 Apr 2008, at 19:11, Nathan Weizenbaum wrote: > > >> Hmm... actually, I do prefer = and +. + makes more sense for insertion >> anyway. >> >> Getting mixins to work through includes would definitely be a plus. >> > > > Here's the patch to do both of these then: > > http://pastie.org/181614 > > This time including documentation. > > g > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
