Given that there's already a pretty good way to do this, and we're
trying to stabilize the Haml feature set, I don't think this is
something we want to add.
Ardekantur wrote:
> Hello all -
>
> I know there's usually apprehension about adding new syntax to an
> established templating language, but I was wondering if anyone has
> thought about the addition of a small helper to make dynamic class
> names easier?
>
> For instance, instead of the normal:
>
> .test{ :class => "#{something} #{something.else}" }
>
> Although HTML allows for class elements with all characters (<div
> class='("")'> is suprisingly valid), HAML won't parse something like
> that, so don't we take advantage of that, and allow:
>
> .test.(something).(something.else)
>
> I'm completely technically ignorant of what work HAML does on the back-
> end to retrieve class and ID names specified with the shortcut syntax,
> so I have no idea how difficult something like this would be, which is
> why I'm asking now :-)
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> - Ardekantur
> >
>
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Haml" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
