If I remember correctly there was talk of some easy attributes, something like :
%div[class='hello' title='something else #...@cool}'] Should be fast, and is very easy on the eye. Is this or similar still being considered? On 22 Dec, 22:44, Nathan Weizenbaum <[email protected]> wrote: > Given that there's already a pretty good way to do this, and we're > trying to stabilize the Haml feature set, I don't think this is > something we want to add. > > Ardekantur wrote: > > Hello all - > > > I know there's usually apprehension about adding new syntax to an > > established templating language, but I was wondering if anyone has > > thought about the addition of a small helper to make dynamic class > > names easier? > > > For instance, instead of the normal: > > > .test{ :class => "#{something} #{something.else}" } > > > Although HTML allows for class elements with all characters (<div > > class='("")'> is suprisingly valid), HAML won't parse something like > > that, so don't we take advantage of that, and allow: > > > .test.(something).(something.else) > > > I'm completely technically ignorant of what work HAML does on the back- > > end to retrieve class and ID names specified with the shortcut syntax, > > so I have no idea how difficult something like this would be, which is > > why I'm asking now :-) > > > Any thoughts? > > > - Ardekantur > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
