Yes, it is. I'll keep the list posted as more is decided on. weepy wrote: > If I remember correctly there was talk of some easy attributes, > something like : > > %div[class='hello' title='something else #...@cool}'] > > Should be fast, and is very easy on the eye. Is this or similar still > being considered? > > > > On 22 Dec, 22:44, Nathan Weizenbaum <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Given that there's already a pretty good way to do this, and we're >> trying to stabilize the Haml feature set, I don't think this is >> something we want to add. >> >> Ardekantur wrote: >> >>> Hello all - >>> >>> I know there's usually apprehension about adding new syntax to an >>> established templating language, but I was wondering if anyone has >>> thought about the addition of a small helper to make dynamic class >>> names easier? >>> >>> For instance, instead of the normal: >>> >>> .test{ :class => "#{something} #{something.else}" } >>> >>> Although HTML allows for class elements with all characters (<div >>> class='("")'> is suprisingly valid), HAML won't parse something like >>> that, so don't we take advantage of that, and allow: >>> >>> .test.(something).(something.else) >>> >>> I'm completely technically ignorant of what work HAML does on the back- >>> end to retrieve class and ID names specified with the shortcut syntax, >>> so I have no idea how difficult something like this would be, which is >>> why I'm asking now :-) >>> >>> Any thoughts? >>> >>> - Ardekantur >>> >> > > > >
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
