...may become *less* of an issue in future Sass releases... pun intended? :-P
Syntax matters from an adoption perspective, but not really much else. As I said on hacker news, the power of sass is going to be increasingly visible in its ability to allow design sharing via compass. The lesscss guy has stated that he doesn't want those powerful features in less. Anyways, I'll be following the development of less and a free flow of concepts between the projects is going to be a good thing for everyone. Already I was talking to nathan about making any top level css class also exposed as a mixin automatically. This would be a relatively trivial change for us. Chris On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Nathan Weizenbaum <[email protected]>wrote: > Yeah, Chris and I have been talking about it. It seems mildly interesting, > and it's always good to have competition, but at the moment the > implementation seems quite immature, and it's not clear what benefits it > offers over Sass (other than possibly syntax, which may become less of an > issue in future Sass releases). > > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:46 AM, s.ross <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Has anyone had a look it this project? Comments? Comparisons? >> >> Thanks >> >> >> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
