On Jun 17, 2009, at 1:44 PM, Mislav Marohnić <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 21:24, s.ross <[email protected]> wrote: > > - WORKS OUT OF THE BOX with Rails, merb, Sinatra, Compass, > Staticmatic, etc., etc. > > StaticMatic and Compass are merely libraries that build on Haml and/ > or Sass. Saying that Haml "works out the box with them" is not > really correct. Ruby doesn't "work out the box with Rails". > > - WORKS OUT OF THE BOX as a standalone > > Actually it doesn't. You have to hook up your own code to do initial > rendering and refreshing when source files update. The point here was that you can install ruby and haml, then do: sass foo.sass > foo.css You can manually compile just as with lesscss. How could this be written better or is it relevant? > > - Refactorable styles via abstraction (variables, expressions, ...) > - Reusable styles via mixins > - Clearly nested styles that exactly mirror your DOM at a glance > - Readable error messages > - Mature and tested, very active community -- look at the project > activity and mailing list > > I like these > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
