On Jun 17, 2009, at 11:15 AM, Noel wrote:
> > I think that part of the reason that less got so much attention has to > do with marketing. By that I mean they really have a nice site and it > is very easy to compare and contrast CSS with LessCss. Also a little Twitter love. You're right. It's hard to overstate how much marketing a technology does for it. Look at "Prototype is bad, jQuery is good." I just have to think some of that has to do with the community uptake of jQuery and how easy it is to find your way around their site and grab plugins. Kudos to Nathan and Hampton for the great ideas and to Chris for showing the world how insanely cool Sass can be in application. This is not to neglect everyone else who's contributed to the project. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
