> And one more thing, why the hell KDE 4.2 has to install mysqld > so it can run akonandi,
That is also something that bugs me a little bit, but I'd say I don't care as long as it works. It doesn't slow down my computer, it doesn't eat even 1% of my HDD space, I meant it is pretty insignificant to me. > KDE 4.2 alone consume 480MBs RAM (that is 4 > times more than vanilla XP and Xfce), did I do something wrong here? I > heard it is pretty light (someone even said it is lighter than xfce). I know one of the dilemmas that tech people have is that one (OS/WM/whatever) needs to be as lean as possible, but as long as large != slow, why should I care? Why do I have to go with something that is like, 1/10 of the size of the other but still lags? I don't care if the OS (Vista)/window manager... eats a lot of memory space, as long as it doesn't slow down the computer. I have like, 2GBs of RAM, and it will be a waste if I don't use them all. Vista called it superfetch or something fancy like that, and I think it is a pretty good idea. I'd say I will trade size to functionality anytime, in terms of everyday computing. -- Huan Truong PLUG: Technology, Security and You - Ngu?n tin c?ng ngh? Vi?t ng? h?ng ??u - http://tnhh.info/tsu/
