I have tried to unsubscribe from this list through Unsubscribe from the list : [email protected] many times.
does this unsubscribe work? Also, I tried to send this message to the ha-proxy news group, but it got bounced back claiming google's ip is a spam bot. Something is not right with this new group. -tim On 1/11/14, Malcolm Turnbull <[email protected]> wrote: > Sorry only just got around to looking at this and updating my blog entry: > > Yes the important bit missing was "agent-check".... > > But my testing with Dev21 seems to bring the servers back fine with > any percentage reading i.e. 10% 75% etc. Please let me know if anyone > else is having an issue, thanks. > > server Win2008R2 192.168.64.50:3389 weight 100 check agent-check > agent-port 3333 inter 2000 rise 2 fall 3 minconn 0 maxconn 0 > on-marked-down shutdown-sessions > > > > On 27 December 2013 22:44, PiBa-NL <[email protected]> wrote: >> Simon Drake schreef op 27-12-2013 17:07: >> >> >> >> Would it be possible to post an example showing the correct haproxy >> config >> to use with the agent-check. >> >> By the way I saw the mailing list post recently about the changes to the >> agent-check, using state and percentage, and I think that the right way >> to >> go. >> >> For me this config works: >> server MyServer 192.168.0.40:80 check inter 5000 >> agent-check >> agent-inter 3333 agent-port 2123 weight 32 >> >> I've tried a few small tests with it, and while bringing a server to >> 'down' >> or 'drain' seemed to work, i was missing the 'up' keyword, only "100%" >> seems >> to bring a server back alive. So if your monitoring 100-%CPUusage and >> sending that 1on1 back to the agent on a server with 99% cpu capacity >> available wont come back up.. > > > > -- > Regards, > > Malcolm Turnbull. > > Loadbalancer.org Ltd. > Phone: +44 (0)870 443 8779 > http://www.loadbalancer.org/ > >
