Thanks. Am talking about the weights , if one server (x) assigned with weight 125 and other server (y) with weight 12 ( added twice in the file) , we see x is getting half of the traffic compared to y. that means weigt has no affects here?
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 12:15 PM, Willy Tarreau <w...@1wt.eu> wrote: > On Sat, Mar 01, 2014 at 11:06:32PM +0530, vijeesh vijayan wrote: > > Thanks. will share screenshot shortly. roundrobin recommented for mysql > > also? > > What Baptiste is explaining is that leastconn focuses on balancing > the number of established connections and not the cumulated number > of connections. If one server responds slowly and the other responds > fast, the slow one will always have a certain number of open > connections while the fast one will have very few. Thus it is normal > that haproxy will pick the fast one more often than the slow one. And > this is precisely the purpose of leastconn. > > Some people use leastconn to avoid servers which are suffering from > some local system perturbations (eg: backups). And in general, what > you're observing means exactly that one server is working much better > than another one. > > So round robin will equally distribute the number of requests to your > servers, but will degrade the quality of service since the slow one > will get more requests than right now, and the fast one will remain > mostly idle waiting for the slow one to get its share. > > Willy > > -- ========================= Vijeesh K "The temptation to quit will be greatest just before you are about to succeed"
