On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 08:27:03PM +0530, vijeesh vijayan wrote: > Thanks. please check my last reply > > >> Thanks. Am talking about the weights , if one server (x) assigned with > weight 125 and other server (y) with weight 12 ( added twice in the file) , > we see x is getting half of the traffic compared to y. that means weigt has > no affects here? > > in this case , server x should be getting 5 folds of connections of y > ideally. but something is preventing this . Am i right? in our case x is > getting only 50 percent of y ( we are calculating the number of > connections/sec) . how do we know how many connections haproxy keep it open > for a particular server?
No, unfortunately you definitely don't understand the difference between *concurrent* connections and *cumulated* connections. You're measuring the number of connections distributed over time. I'm talking about concurrent connections, which is what leastconn is about. Willy
