Hi Willy,
> So in my opinion, since the protocol is designed to be backwards and
> forwards compatible, and uses minor version for newer extensions, there
> is no reason for limiting ourselves to TLSv1.2 for extensions that
> exist since 1.0 and will certainly continue to be supported by later
> version, at least for backwards compatibility.
Ok. I do in fact agree with this and it matches with what I was saying
earlier in this thread, I just didn't take the time to read the RFC
carefully enough to draw the same conclusion.
Thanks,
Lukas
