Hi James, On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 10:14:57AM -0400, James Westby wrote: > I like the short names after the field names, so I've implemented > that. I also rebased on top of master (turns out the github mirror was > outdated), and included the listener information.
Great they applied fine this time and I also prefer the way they look now. > Also, I'm excited for the point when I'll be able to use the new *time > stats, they will be very nice to have. Just keep in mind that this is an infinite sliding window and that you will get within 95% accuracy for the previous 1024 samples. Just do a "git log -2 4bfc580dd" to get all the information about the algorithm involved if you want to understand better. I tried this algorithm for the first time something like 12 years ago (for "inject") but failed at it and always postponed investigations to fix it. Then I wanted to try it again for the stats page but remembered it required to be fixed and would never assign the time to work on it again. And finally I had some fun with it during the week-end just before the 1.5 release and that allowed me to remove an item from my todo list :-) So please do not hesitate to report your observations. Just keep in mind that the average output value reflects the latest measures much more than the oldest ones. Once you have that in mind, you know what you observe. Thanks, Willy
