As someone that reads the content on this list very regularly, I see next to no spam because gmail spam filters in the most part work really well. Actually someone coming along avery few months and whining about spam is far more annoying and spammy. Perhaps Willy should add a rule to blacklist anyone from posting who can’t just get on cope with the fact mailing lists are always going to have spam.
> On 23 Jun 2015, at 10:32, Hoggins! <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > What surprises me the most is that I'm a subscriber for lots of other > mailing-lists, and that's the only one that has a significant amount of > spam. > On my opinion, the problem is not the antispam filter, it's the right to > communicate on that mailing-list. How come a mail such as > [email protected] is allowed to post things about those damn LED bulbs ? > Isn't there a simple way to avoid such noise by just having a whitelist > of posters ? > > Hoggins! > > Le 22/06/2015 17:53, Willy Tarreau a écrit : >> On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 01:37:59PM +0200, Pavlos Parissis wrote: >>> >>> On 19/06/2015 11:08 ????, Andrei Marinescu wrote: >>>> Same here, only 1-2 messages per week, and generally correctly tagged as >>>> [SPAM]. Way less than the last discussion on this topic produced J >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> +1 >>> >>> This has been discussed before and Willy expressed the reasons why there >>> isn't any smap filter in the ML. >>> >>> Personally, I am fine with the current setup as gmail does very good job >>> for filtering spam mails for me. >> There *is* a spam filter now, it simply tags SPAM what it finds as such, >> and does not delete anything (which is fortunate since we've had one or >> two false positives already). The recent "leds" spams are passing through >> it for now, let's hope they'll be detected soon. >> >> Willy >> >> > >
