Oh great ! I was not aware that this list was also a nest for personal
attacks.
Thank you.

Le 24/06/2015 16:03, Willy Tarreau a écrit :
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 02:40:51PM +0200, Hoggins! wrote:
>> Ha ha ! We could also imagine an anti-sarcasm filter.
> Not needed.
>
>> Anyway, that still does not explain why such discussions on spam
>> problems do not occur on other mailman MLs.
> Maybe you've been living under a rock for the last 20 years, but spam
> is quite common as soon as you have an e-mail address that anyone knows.
>
>> I get a lot of spam from
>> this ML, and *none* from others, even with a high volume of ham messages.
> Probably because you quickly unsubscribe from lists which send you some
> spam and you end up being subscribed only to the ones who do aggressive
> filtering to the point that even useful messages get dropped ? Or people
> posting from various origins regularly getting blocked due to political
> RBLs or DNSBLs being used... Before switching to the anti-spam, it took
> more time to deal with abnormal blocking than with spam. So no thanks.
>
> Or maybe you only subscribe to closed lists which, like sects, only accept
> subscribers and reject any external contribution, and are insulting to
> whoever is put in CC. Not to mention the fact that someone using multiple
> addresses can only post from one or receive the same messages multiple
> times.
>
> The list is open, the archives are available, and the spam amount is low,
> even if the ratio is quite high due to the low traffic of the list. If
> that causes any trouble, you don't need to be subscribed, you can simply
> unsusbcribe and post whenever you want without being subscribed.
>
> We're not trying to set a record on the number of subscribers so nobody
> will feel offended by you unsubscribing.
>
> However I'd just make a comment : posting to a list with a nickname such
> as "Hoggins!" and an address which doesn't look serious, rather impolite
> like "[email protected]" is not the best way to receive consideration
> for your posts.
>
> Regards,
> Willy
>
>


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to