Malcolm,
The Piranha gui had some configurations about Virtual IPs and I am not
sure how that works or how it is different than HAProxy. The firewall had some
rules that pointed website requests to the virtual ips.
Daniel
-----Original Message-----
From: Malcolm Turnbull [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2015 2:55 PM
To: Jonathan Matthews <[email protected]>
Cc: Daniel Zenczak <[email protected]>; haproxy <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: SSL and Piranha conversion
Piranha is a front end for LVS (layer 4 load balancing)....
So I'm assuming that all your Piranha box was doing was forwarding port 443 &
80 to your two servers...
So just set up HAProxy in TCP mode for port 80 & 443.
Test it , and then when you are happy point your DNS at it.
On 8 September 2015 at 20:23, Jonathan Matthews <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 8 Sep 2015 20:07, "Daniel Zenczak" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Hello All,
>>
>> First time caller, short time listener. So this is
>> the deal. My organization was running a CentOS box with Piranha on
>> it to work as our load balancer between our two web servers. Well
>> the CentOS box was a Gateway workstation from 2000 and it finally gave up
>> the ghost.
>
> May I suggest you reconsider migrating your hardware and software at
> the same time, both whilst under pressure? It will be massively
> simpler to install your preexisting choice of (known "good") software
> on your new hardware.
>
> Jonathan
--
Regards,
Malcolm Turnbull.
Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
Phone: +44 (0)330 1604540
http://www.loadbalancer.org/
