> On 12 Mar 2017, at 11:34, Matthias Fechner <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I checked the port again and there is one patch applied to haproxy, but > it is a different file, so it should not cause the patch to fail, but > maybe can cause other problems. > --- src/hlua_fcn.c.orig 2016-12-17 13:58:44.786067000 +0300 > +++ src/hlua_fcn.c 2016-12-17 13:59:17.551256000 +0300 > @@ -39,6 +39,12 @@ static int class_listener_ref; > > #define STATS_LEN (MAX((int)ST_F_TOTAL_FIELDS, (int)INF_TOTAL_FIELDS)) > > +#if defined(__FreeBSD__) || defined(__NetBSD__) || defined(__OpenBSD__) > +#define s6_addr8 __u6_addr.__u6_addr8 > +#define s6_addr16 __u6_addr.__u6_addr16 > +#define s6_addr32 __u6_addr.__u6_addr32 > +#endif > + > static struct field stats[STATS_LEN]; > > int hlua_checkboolean(lua_State *L, int index) > >
I removed this patch from ports. It was needed for previous version to compile and should not cause any problems. Now it became obsoleted.
