On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 07:16:51PM +0100, Aaron West wrote: > Hi Willy, > > Sorry to bother you, just a quick question if I may. > > Does support for QUIC imply we'd have rudimentary UDP support as well > or is it only going to support QUIC Protocol?
It will be UDP for QUIC only. Do you have a *valid* use case for UDP proxying ? I'm asking because every time people ask for UDP support, it's for totally stupid reasons like NFS, for non-proxyable protocols, for protocols which are designed not to need a load balancer (eg: DNS) or for trivial stuff that is already naturally handled by their operating system (eg: done by LVS). That's why I'm interested in knowing about a valid case ;-) Cheers, Willy