2017-10-15 23:43 GMT+05:00 Willy Tarreau <w...@1wt.eu>:

> On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 07:16:51PM +0100, Aaron West wrote:
> > Hi Willy,
> >
> > Sorry to bother you, just a quick question if I may.
> >
> > Does support for QUIC imply we'd have rudimentary UDP support as well
> > or is it only going to support QUIC Protocol?
> It will be UDP for QUIC only.
> Do you have a *valid* use case for UDP proxying ? I'm asking because every
> time people ask for UDP support, it's for totally stupid reasons like NFS,
> for non-proxyable protocols, for protocols which are designed not to need
> a load balancer (eg: DNS) or for trivial stuff that is already naturally
> handled by their operating system (eg: done by LVS). That's why I'm
> interested in knowing about a valid case ;-)

dns is valid case, openvpn comes to mind also, but need to look carefully
with switching between two or more servers.
I'd say, udp balancing is tricky (thre's no syn/ack), so let us stick to

> Cheers,
> Willy

Reply via email to