On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 08:07:17PM +0200, Sander Klein wrote: > On 2017-10-16 14:19, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 01:28:12PM +0200, Pavlos Parissis wrote: > > > I guess following step-by-step approach, 1st client side, it makes > > > sense as > > > it reduces the size of breakage:-) > > > > Yes but not only this. It's also the fact that the main benefits of H2 > > are > > on the client side, where the latency is the highest. > > Which is funny, because I wanted to use H2 to connect to the server side > since I have a situation (please, don't ask) where latency between HAProxy > and the server is quite high. Looking at this I thought using H2 to connect > to the server might be a dirty/easy 'fix' to get this more acceptable.
I really want to have this done ultimately (ie: for 1.9). For various use cases like inter-DC communications, CDNs etc it makes sense. Willy
