Tim. Am 22.01.2019 um 20:26 schrieb Tim Düsterhus: > Aleks, > > Am 22.01.19 um 19:38 schrieb Aleksandar Lazic: >> ## test results in: >> "/tmp/haregtests-2019-01-22_18-28-24.aBghMD/vtc.3398.76167f9e" >> ---- s1 0.0 EXPECT req.http.test3maskff (2001:db8:c001:c01a::ffff:10:0) == >> "2001:db8:c001:c01a:0:ffff:10:0" failed > > The difference here is that the test expects an IPv6 address that's not > maximally compressed, while you get a IPv6 address that *is* maximally > compressed. I would guess that this is the difference in behaviour > between glibc and musl (as you are using an Alpine container).
Ah that explains this error. This means that the function in haproxy works but the check should be adopted to match both cases, right? Do you think that in general the alpine/musl is a good idea or should I stay on centos as for my other images? Any Idea for the other failed tests? ------------- ########################## Starting vtest ########################## Testing with haproxy version: 1.9.2 # top TEST ./reg-tests/http-rules/h00002.vtc FAILED (0.859) exit=2 # top TEST ./reg-tests/mailers/k_healthcheckmail.vtc FAILED (7.739) exit=2 # top TEST ./reg-tests/log/b00000.vtc TIMED OUT (kill -9) # top TEST ./reg-tests/log/b00000.vtc FAILED (10.001) signal=9 # top TEST ./reg-tests/http-messaging/h00002.vtc FAILED (0.752) exit=2 4 tests failed, 0 tests skipped, 29 tests passed ########################## Gathering results ########################## ###### Test case: ./reg-tests/http-messaging/h00002.vtc ###### ## test results in: "/tmp/haregtests-2019-01-22_19-34-55.EKMMnc/vtc.3399.7739e83e" ---- c1h2 0.0 Wrong frame type HEADERS (1) wanted WINDOW_UPDATE ###### Test case: ./reg-tests/log/b00000.vtc ###### ## test results in: "/tmp/haregtests-2019-01-22_19-34-55.EKMMnc/vtc.3399.2776263d" ###### Test case: ./reg-tests/http-rules/h00002.vtc ###### ## test results in: "/tmp/haregtests-2019-01-22_19-34-55.EKMMnc/vtc.3399.0900be1e" ---- s1 0.0 EXPECT req.http.test3maskff (2001:db8:c001:c01a::ffff:10:0) == "2001:db8:c001:c01a:0:ffff:10:0" failed ###### Test case: ./reg-tests/mailers/k_healthcheckmail.vtc ###### ## test results in: "/tmp/haregtests-2019-01-22_19-34-55.EKMMnc/vtc.3399.506e5b2b" ---- c2 7.0 EXPECT resp.http.mailsreceived (11) == "16" failed ------------- > Best regards > Tim Düsterhus Regards Aleks
