Hi Aleksandar,
Just FYI.
Op 22-1-2019 om 22:08 schreef Aleksandar Lazic:
But this could be a know bug and is fixed in the current git
---------------------------------
########################## Starting vtest ##########################
Testing with haproxy version: 1.9.2
# top TEST ./reg-tests/mailers/k_healthcheckmail.vtc FAILED (7.808) exit=2
1 tests failed, 0 tests skipped, 32 tests passed
########################## Gathering results ##########################
###### Test case: ./reg-tests/mailers/k_healthcheckmail.vtc ######
## test results in:
"/tmp/haregtests-2019-01-22_20-56-31.QMI0Ue/vtc.5740.39907fe1"
---- c2 7.0 EXPECT resp.http.mailsreceived (11) == "16" failed
This was indeed identified as a bug, and is fixed in current master.
The impact of this was rather low though, and this specific issue of a
few 'missing' mails under certain configuration circumstances existed
for years before it was spotted with the regtest.
https://www.mail-archive.com/haproxy@formilux.org/msg32190.html
http://git.haproxy.org/?p=haproxy.git;a=commit;h=774c486cece942570b6a9d16afe236a16ee12079
Regards,
PiBa-NL (Pieter)
