On Sun, Jan 26, 2020 at 8:15 PM Илья Шипицин <chipits...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> вс, 26 янв. 2020 г. в 23:12, William Dauchy <w.dau...@criteo.com>:
>
>> On Sun, Jan 26, 2020 at 7:08 PM Илья Шипицин <chipits...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > such things are fragile.  once fixed, they can silently break during
>> further refactoring.
>> > on other hand, such functions are good candidates to write unit tests.
>>
>> I considered it but to my knowledge, this is currently not possible
>> with varnishtest, as we would need to mock a dns resolution, and make
>> haproxy starts. I don't know whether there are other plans for haproxy
>> tests.
>>
>
>
> I do not mean varnishtest here.
>
> varnishtest is "full stack functional test", it is too expensive.
>
> I mean lightweight unit testing, for example, cmocka.
>
>
>> --
>> William
>>
>

On a side note, I am working on building tests for the DNS in HAProxy using
socat + script as a DNS server in vtest.
I am at a point where dig can query my socat+script, then I'll try HAProxy,
then I'll do the vtest integration.

Baptiste

Reply via email to