Willy, Am 16.02.20 um 07:46 schrieb Willy Tarreau: > In fact it's not a bug since the storage type remains the same (int vs > unsigned int). However I hate seeing sizeof(type) being placed anywhere
I don't know whether the standard requires the storage size to match or not :-) > instead of sizeof(*pointer) because these are hard to find the day the > type changes and can cause bugs later. > > So I'd rather tag it as cleanup and not backport it since it will not > change the output code. I'm fine with that. Best regards Tim Düsterhus
