On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 11:50:50AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> It's not a bug, it's just a way to ensure a common error path undoes
> everything that was done before reaching it. If another operation is
> added after the DIR_WR malloc, it will only have to add its own undo
> operation to the fail label instead of having to figure which one was
> the last to suceed and whether or not it needs to be addressed.
> Thus I'd rather not change it since it does not have any impact and
> makes the code more future-proof.

understood, thanks for the feedback.


Reply via email to