On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 11:50:50AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > It's not a bug, it's just a way to ensure a common error path undoes > everything that was done before reaching it. If another operation is > added after the DIR_WR malloc, it will only have to add its own undo > operation to the fail label instead of having to figure which one was > the last to suceed and whether or not it needs to be addressed. > > Thus I'd rather not change it since it does not have any impact and > makes the code more future-proof.
understood, thanks for the feedback. -- William
