I mean, I certainly do. And today's unstable haproxy is tomorrow's stable haproxy...
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 1:48 PM Илья Шипицин <chipits...@gmail.com> wrote: > we run CI only for master branch. > > do all those people want to run latest unstable haproxy on oldish RHEL 6 ? > > пн, 16 нояб. 2020 г. в 23:56, James Brown <jbr...@easypost.com>: > >> Since CentOS 6 / RHEL 6 is the last pre-systemd release, I think there >> are lots of shops planning on keeping it around with various >> community-supported backports for years to come. I would vote to keep it >> around until it becomes an undue burden for CI, because there are still >> tons of EL6 users out there that have no migration path. >> >> On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 1:55 PM John Lauro <johnala...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> CentOS 6 isn't EOL until the end of the month, so there is a couple of >>> more weeks left. >>> >>> There is at least one place to pay for support through 2024. >>> ($3/month/server) >>> >>> Might be good to keep for a a bit past EOL, as I know when migrating >>> services sometimes I'll throw a proxy server on the old server to the new >>> one... and there will likely be some that don't make the Nov 30th deadline >>> to retire all Centos 6 servers. >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 11:15 AM Илья Шипицин <chipits...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> we still run cirrus-ci builds. >>>> CentOS 6 is EOL. >>>> >>>> should we drop it? >>>> >>>> Ilya >>>> >>> >> >> -- >> James Brown >> Engineer >> > -- James Brown Engineer
