Maciej, Am 20.11.20 um 15:58 schrieb Maciej Zdeb: > I've implemented a http-request del-header with optional flag -m [beg, sub, > str, end]. I'm not sure if my approach is correct so I'm not adding support > for the "reg" method in these patches. I've doubts about (ab)using the > action field in the act_rule struct for storing selected matching method. > What if we'll need additional flags? :) >
In 0002: + default: + memprintf(err, "-m with unsupported matching method '%s'", args[cur_arg]); + return ACT_RET_PRS_ERR;; + } There's a duplicate semicolon there. In 0003: Merge the test into the previous commit, please. This ensures the test is always there when the feature is there and absent if it is not. Best regards Tim Düsterhus
