On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 06:10:41PM +0100, Tim Duesterhus wrote: > Rephrase the message to no longer talk about something that "is no longer > supported", but about what actually *is* supported.
Thanks, I like this output better than the previous one and just merged it. That doesn't mean I'm still totally convinced about SSL itself but seeing LUA, ZLIB and PCRE there makes me think that even though SSL is a common dependency, it's not that much special in itself. Let's try with this as a starter, and in parallel let's see what other users think of this. There's no rush anyway, we still have a few months before 2.4 to change our minds multiple times based on feedback :-) Willy
