чт, 7 сент. 2023 г. в 00:05, Hopkins, Andrew <and...@amazon.com>:

> I tried it and HAProxy doesn’t build with AWS-LC when quic is turned on.
> There are at least two issues:
> 1. AWS-LC’s TLS 1.3 cipher suite names are a little different, this is
> easy to fix and I opened https://github.com/aws/aws-lc/pull/1175
>
> 2. ChaCha Poly and AES CCM are not usable through the EVP_CIPHER API,
> AWS-LC only exposes these through the AEAD API
>
>
>
> How important is ChaCha Poly & AES CCM to HAProxy and your users? I see
> three options:
>

it is mandatory, browsers require it.


accidentally "QUIC without ChaCha Poly" was implemented for LibreSSL (it
was added few commits later), nothing worked from browser point of view.


> 1. AWS-LC plumbs these two algorithms through the EVP_CIPHER API. This is
> useful for HAProxy and other AWS-LC customers, but is the most work
> 2. HAProxy adopts AWS-LC’s (and BoringSSL’s) AEAD API
>
> 3. HAProxy turns off ChaCha Poly and AES CCM support in quic when built
> with AWS-LC
>

I recall there was similar usage for BoringSSL, maybe just modifying
"ifdef" should work


>
>
>
>
> *From: *Илья Шипицин <chipits...@gmail.com>
> *Date: *Wednesday, September 6, 2023 at 5:41 AM
> *To: *William Lallemand <wlallem...@haproxy.com>
> *Cc: *"Hopkins, Andrew" <and...@amazon.com>, Willy Tarreau <w...@1wt.eu>,
> Aleksandar Lazic <al-hapr...@none.at>, "haproxy@formilux.org" <
> haproxy@formilux.org>
> *Subject: *RE: [EXTERNAL] [PATCH] BUILD: ssl: Build with new
> cryptographic library AWS-LC
>
>
>
> *CAUTION*: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not
> click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know
> the content is safe.
>
>
>
> based on USE_OPENSSL_AWSLC quic may be enabled  ?
>
>
>
> ср, 6 сент. 2023 г. в 14:26, William Lallemand <wlallem...@haproxy.com>:
>
> On Tue, Sep 05, 2023 at 11:56:26PM +0000, Hopkins, Andrew wrote:
> > I split up the remaining CI changes into 4 new attached patches. The
> > latest changes are still passing on my fork
> > https://github.com/andrewhop/haproxy/actions/runs/6090899582.
> >
>
> Thanks, I just merged them!
>
>
> > I was hoping to take advantage of the better HAProxy support in
> > AWS-LC's CI but I'm running into some issues in
> > https://github.com/aws/aws-lc/pull/1174 I was wondering if you had any
> > pointers of what to look at. I think this is CodeBuild specific issue
> > since the tests pass in HAProxy's CI and when I run AWS-LC's CI
> > locally. I just can't figure out what CodeBuild might be doing to mess
> > with the results.
> >
> > Looking at the log for mcli_start_progs.vtc the two sleep programs are
> > started as expected but the overall process returns the wrong exit
> > code (0x0 instead of 0x82). Does anything stand out to you as weird
> > looking?
> >
>
> I never used CodeBuild so I'm not aware on any timers or process
> limitation but that could be something like that.
>
> From what I understand from the trace, I think every processes received a
> SIGTERM. You can see 2 "Exiting Master process..." and the first one is
> before
> the "kill" from VTest which is suppose to send a SIGINT so it was probably
> sent
> outside the test.
>
> This test should finish like this:
>
> ***  h1    debug|00000000:MASTER.accept(0008)=000e from [127.0.0.1:41542]
> ALPN=<none>
> ***  h1    debug|00000000:MASTER.srvcls[000e:ffff]
> **** h1    CLI connection normally closed
> ***  h1    CLI closing fd 9
> **** h1    CLI recv|#<PID>          <type>          <reloads>
>  <uptime>        <version>
> **** h1    CLI recv|357949          master          0 [failed: 0]
>  0d00h00m00s     2.9-dev4-06d369-78
> **** h1    CLI recv|# workers
> **** h1    CLI recv|357955          worker          0
>  0d00h00m00s     2.9-dev4-06d369-78
> **** h1    CLI recv|# programs
> **** h1    CLI recv|357953          foo             0
>  0d00h00m00s     -
> **** h1    CLI recv|357954          bar             0
>  0d00h00m00s     -
> **** h1    CLI recv|
> ***  h1    debug|00000001:MASTER.clicls[ffff:ffff]
> ***  h1    debug|00000001:MASTER.closed[ffff:ffff]
> **** h1    CLI expect match ~ ".*foo.*
> .*bar.*
> "
> **   h1    CLI ending
> **   h1    Wait
> **   h1    Stop HAproxy pid=357949
> **** h1    Kill(2)=0: Success
> ***  h1    debug|[NOTICE]   (357949) : haproxy version is
> 2.9-dev4-06d369-78
> ***  h1    debug|[NOTICE]   (357949) : path to executable is
> /home/wla/projects/haproxy/haproxy-community-maint/haproxy
> ***  h1    debug|[WARNING]  (357949) : Exiting Master process...
> ***  h1    debug|[ALERT]    (357949) : Current program 'foo' (357953)
> exited with code 130 (Interrupt)
> ***  h1    debug|[ALERT]    (357949) : Current program 'bar' (357954)
> exited with code 130 (Interrupt)
> **** dT    0.076
> ***  h1    debug|[ALERT]    (357949) : Current worker (357955) exited with
> code 130 (Interrupt)
> ***  h1    debug|[WARNING]  (357949) : All workers exited. Exiting... (130)
> **** dT    0.077
> **** h1    STDOUT EOF
> **** dT    0.171
> **   h1    WAIT4 pid=357949 status=0x8200 (user 0.058881 sys 0.026402)
> *    top   RESETTING after reg-tests/mcli/mcli_start_progs.vtc
> **   h1    Reset and free h1 haproxy -1
> **** dT    0.172
> **   s1    Waiting for server (4/-1)
> *    top   TEST reg-tests/mcli/mcli_start_progs.vtc completed
> *    diag  0.0 /usr/bin/sleep
> #    top  TEST reg-tests/mcli/mcli_start_progs.vtc passed (0.173)
> 0 tests failed, 0 tests skipped, 1 tests passed
>
>
> --
> William Lallemand
>
>

Reply via email to