> I hope that Harbour 2.0 support qt 4.6 > I have seen same step made from István,Andi Jahja
Hm, did you read what I wrote? There is a quite large risk in including a MINGW build which was used/tested by _nobody_ on the list, including me, who is assembling the package. > invite anybody post feedback with qt 4.6 > > A qt binary release ready to use with Visual studio 2008 will be a good step Yes, this needs someone to fix the warning (posted on the list a few days ago), plus someone to give an insight on mixing different C RTL libs in one binary (asked this question a few weeks ago). But even if these are answered, I wouldn't choose 4.6 yet, since it would be large mistake to use 4.6 for MSVC and 4.5.x for MINGW lib in one release, since this would cause a huge confusion besides looking unprofessional. I'd close this topic from a different angle: What does QT 4.6 offer over 4.5.x, that is so important that it's worth to risk whole Harbour quality because of it? (or delaying the release by - say - a month) Brgds, Viktor _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB) [email protected] http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
