> Viktor Szakáts wrote: >> >> What does QT 4.6 offer over 4.5.x, that is >> so important that it's worth to risk whole >> Harbour quality because of it? (or delaying >> the release by - say - a month) >> > > Nothing special except some more advanced classes > dealing with "gestures". And probably in the near future > I am not going to touch them. We need a stable framewprk > based on Qt 4.5 only then we can march ahead. > > So, the final word is Harbour 2.0 is going to support 4.5 only.
Thank you. I think I'll save myself the hurdle of installing 4.5.3, and settle on 4.5.2 which is readily and easily available from QT homepage. 4.5.3 is hard to dig out. As for QT for MSVC, I've since deleted the locally built version, so I'll have to recheck if the standard (MINGW) one is enough to build it. Brgds, Viktor _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB) [email protected] http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
