Hi
Viktor Szakáts wrote: > > What does QT 4.6 offer over 4.5.x, that is > so important that it's worth to risk whole > Harbour quality because of it? (or delaying > the release by - say - a month) > Nothing special except some more advanced classes dealing with "gestures". And probably in the near future I am not going to touch them. We need a stable framewprk based on Qt 4.5 only then we can march ahead. So, the final word is Harbour 2.0 is going to support 4.5 only. Regards Pritpal Bedi -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Release-notes-questions-tp26825506p26832160.html Sent from the Harbour - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB) [email protected] http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
