> It is a summary of a long way hunting/debugging, so these short > sentences/fragments are not adequate to describe the fix. But, as I see this > is an usual way for fixing, without so much details.
I'd like to kindly ask you to elaborate more. I think it's rather the opposite in ChangeLog than what you observed, but of course if there is lacking text, pls inform the list, and we shall correct it. ChangeLog is the most important place to document changes along with the reasoning. I expect ppl to know what I'm changing, and I expect users to test my changes, which is usually impossible without knowing what to test. > Please test it in MinGW environment, should fix some errors mainly in object > handlings regarding the Heap managements. Since I still don't know what to test, I can't help here. For me everything worked without any visible problems, so it would be quite blind run to test for enhancements. How about the other change? Brgds, Viktor _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB) [email protected] http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
