On 2010 Jan 3, at 00:18, Bisz István wrote:
>> Maybe MinGW was the same, but it didn't report it?
>
> Personally, I reported it several times, sorry.
Until I can see a way to replicating it on any
system, to me the matter stays shady.
>> Currently above msg will also appear when not compiled
>> with fmstat. I'll commit a fix.
>
> OK.
>
>> Plus we're not using the official C++ allocation override
>> for HBQT yet, which may be a problem. What do you think?
>
> Could you please more explicit, regarding this issue.
You're testing HBQT unreleased memory as reported by
our memory manager, but C++ mode isn't currently fully
(or at all?) setup to use our own memory allocation
functions.
Here is the complete set which needs to be overridden
as per QT documentation:
---
#include "hbapi.h"
void * operator new[]( size_t size )
{
return hb_xgrab( size );
}
void * operator new( size_t size )
{
return hb_xgrab( size );
}
void operator delete[]( void * ptr )
{
hb_xfree( ptr );
}
void operator delete[]( void * ptr, size_t )
{
hb_xfree( ptr );
}
void operator delete( void * ptr )
{
hb_xfree( ptr );
}
void operator delete( void * ptr, size_t )
{
hb_xfree( ptr );
}
---
I've committed it to fm.c.
Brgds,
Viktor
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB)
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
