> Perhaps: > VAR events // in QApplication > instead of: > STATIC s_events > > Former is much cleaner. QApplication class > seems to be a requirement for any HBQT app > so it seems doable. > > Anyway just ignore this like most other > suggestions from me. For me it's not a problem.
Or please tell us clearly why this is not possible... I believe Qt is a great "framework", a lot more than a framework and your work (hbide for example) shows how powerfull it is. And more, Qt is really documented: web sites, books and a lot of source code available to study on.... and it is a REAL PLUS for a harbour gui framework But if hbqt deviates too much from standard Qt.... a lot of docs won't match, code portability from c++ will not be easy.... _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB) Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
