Hi Viktor, It turns out that my tests of doing the devout calls to the screen in Win9x with the unicows solution is about 2 or 3 times slower than non-unicode compiled .EXEs on the same machine. And this is with Przemek's SET CURSOR OFF trick as well for Win9x machines...
So this simple test and its performance hit would leave me to conclude that the unicows solution isn't 100% perfect. Just my two cents. If it cannot be solved, then I suppose my vote would be to still keep the non-unicode mode...? I don't know enough about Harbour to see the implications :[ On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 5:13 AM, Viktor Szakáts <harbour...@syenar.hu>wrote: > > It's unlikely we shall ever support Windows 3.x or Win32s, > and unicows solution works just perfect now to cover Win9x/ME > host versions, >
_______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB) Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
