--- Ronald Ponto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Which would go more support on this forum Cache on WIndows, OR GT-M? > How > would I get GT-M? >
The list does seem to have a preponderance of GT.M users, but VOE runs on Cache' not GT.M. Ironically, I might be more ready to use GT.M if the list didn't seem so lop-sided on the GT.M side. I don't have an infinite amount of time, and certainly can't do everything I'd like, but I think it would be very nice to see a portable implementation that could be distributed with VistA installed (even if not completely configured). I am not at all happy with the way Linux seems to be the only OS that anyone wants to use for development. Again, I think I might be a bit more friendly to Linux if there were more of a balance (and if the distribution weren't so "kute"). Sorry this is turning into such a soapbox type message, but I think the community really needs to focus on supporting at least Linux, FreeBSD, OS X and Windows. I know the last two are commercial operating systems (though support for OpenDarwin would be really nice, too), but shouldn't the focus be on making *VistA* available, not on promoting the use of Linux? === Gregory Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Interaction is the mind-body problem of computing." --Philip L. Wadler
