On 3/21/06, Richard Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This has been an interesting thread to say the least. > > The fact that a group like the Disability Policy Consortium is concerned > is actually a great sign! It means that the open source applications > that the Disability Policy Consortium is interested in is having an > impact on their constituency. There would be no use for that group to > complain about software that had no relevance to its users. > > Usability and accessability continues to be a huge problem in the open > source community, with most likely ZERO open source applications > claiming to be Section 508 compliant. >
I thought that I heard somewhere that CPRS, because it was a government program, had met certain disability standards, like being able to use it without a mouse etc. Is this true? Kevin ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642 _______________________________________________ Hardhats-members mailing list Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members
