I'm curious why, aside from the fact that the Mac community is very
devoted to the Mac architecture (and has a greater tendency to
proselytize), people seem to want to shoehorn GT.M/VistA into the Intel
based Mac. Why not use an Intel or AMD based PC, which would run Linux
GT.M/VistA out of the box, without the closed source Bootcamp. You can
put together some screaming dual core AMD machines pretty inexpensively.
chuck5566 wrote:
There is no need need to wait or even go to the Apple Developer site.
The tools are on the install disc. And if you bought an Intel Mini,
then the Intel/Universal Binary tools are included. You can make a
wreave bet on it.
On Apr 11, 2006, at 8:51 AM, Gregory Woodhouse wrote:
On Apr 11, 2006, at 6:51 AM, Nancy Anthracite wrote:
Yes, it is the non-disclosure agreement. My son advised me against
agreeing
to it as he said the wording is too subject to interpretation.
However, if
there is no way around it, then I will have to ignore my lawyer's advice.
Well, you can wait for Leopard. I'm not sure, but I think the
developer tools for 10.4 (Tiger) on the Intel platform are considered
a developer preview.
Gregory Woodhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Those who are enamored of practice
without theory are like a pilot who goes
into a ship without rudder or compass."
--Leonardo da Vinci (1452-1519)
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Hardhats-members mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members
