At 10:27 PM 01/06/2005, Eli Allen wrote:
Reverse the meaning of what a 1 and 5 mean in the test. So basically make
1 be strongly agree and 5 be strongly disagree but then change around the
questions so strongly agreeing is bad in some cases but good in others.
Also include in there some questions that contradict each other, i.e. if
they strongly agree with one question that same question is in reverse
somewhere else so they better disagree then or else the result should be
thrown out.
That doesn't help in this case. So far as I can tell, the cheaters aren't
trying to give someone good or bad scores, they are just trying to skew the
results so that they can't be trusted (so they either enter all 1s or all
5s. I think it's being done in protest of the idea of performance
reviews. It's probably only going to be fixed if management convinces the
employees that the reviews aren't there to punish employees, but to help
improve team work. Hard to say if this will ever happen.
T
