> True would mean factual, and facts are not a part of faith. But lets not > have logic, facts, and truth get in the way of your reasoning, after all > it's just religion.
That's just your opinion - which you have given no supporting argument for. I'm generally opposed to 'religion' (in the way it's commonly used), what I have is personal relationship with Jesus, based predominantly on the historical truths about him (see my post to Stan). I don't expect you to begin to understand or accept that, and I won't abuse you because of the opinions you hold. I wonder if you will return the courtesy? Regards ____________________________________ Neil Atwood - Sydney, Australia http://westserve.org - Blog, Christianity, Coffee and Tech Stuff. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pat Robertson Sent: Friday, 23 December 2005 6:12 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [H] OT - Intelligent Design dealt harsh blow by NJ Judge >From: "Neil Atwood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], The Hardware List ><[email protected]> >To: "'The Hardware List'" <[email protected]> >Subject: RE: [H] OT - Intelligent Design dealt harsh blow by NJ Judge >Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 17:02:18 +1100 > >You really are a rude and arrogant person Mr Robertson. Sad to think that >one day you will awake to realise that much of what you write off as 'fairy >tales' is true. True would mean factual, and facts are not a part of faith. But lets not have logic, facts, and truth get in the way of your reasoning, after all it's just religion.
