Yes, and have read that when Westell comes in "bridge" mode, most of the
internal features are disabled.  Just do not know what will arrive.
We will all know next week some time.  I do plan to share when questions/
glitches arrive, or, before. The basic plan is plug it in and try and make it work
from what I've been taught/learned to do.
IF that fails, I'll post share here. If that goes dry, I'll call the "help desk" and talk to the "person-with-the-3-ring-binder" just to start the paper trail to
the 1-800 for 2d/3rd tier support.  Once I have that, cake!  Plus, any/all
suggestions from the List.

Yes, I do like the "bridge" mode choice.  Do not know if I will be able to
enable/force that.  Can we talk further about the "live IP" business?
Interesting.  Do you mean the dynamic IP I will be assigned transfers
straight across the WAN port to my router?  I like that idea.
Think the router will like that too.
I really do wish I had a firmer grasp of this stuff like I thought I did years
ago.  LOL!  Into the breach again.....
Best,
Duncan
At 22:58 10/10/2007 -0400, jmaccraw wrote:

Similar Westell here in "bridge mode" to a Linksys
WRT54GS w/ DD-Wrt firmware
working great. Seems to be their standard modem with
multi-client NAT & basic
router+firewall if you want to use it that way.

Personally no matter what the tell you, I suggest
bridge mode since it brings a
live IP your router/firewall/WAP rather than private
ip -> WAP -> private IP.


Richard Kim wrote:
> Using 2 Westell modems via Verizon DSL service. Both
of them are 6100 model.
> One says DSL modem, the other says DSL2+Router. Both
have worked well with
> Linksys and Netgear routers. Pretty solid. Needed to
reset maybe 1-2x a
> year.
>
>
>




____________________________________________________________________________________
Shape Yahoo! in your own image. Join our Network Research Panel today! http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/yahoo_panel_invite.asp?a=7


This email scanned for Viruses and Spam by ZCloud.net

Reply via email to