I do the same thing, I no longer do OS and data partitions either.
For us this is not a big deal but I have seen a few thru here setup like that 
with C FULL and D empty. PPL do not know to change the install routines and I 
am not sure if this can be tweaked in the registry or not.
FWIW
fp

At 04:11 PM 10/30/2008, Stan Zaske Poked the stick with:
>When I first started partitioning my drives with separate WinXP and data 
>sections I started with 15 gigs and then 20 when that didn't seem large 
>enough. I did however run into a program that wouldn't work because it 
>complained that there wasn't enough space on drive C. My latest build is a 
>game machine with Vista upgrade and I just made it all one partition to save 
>time.
>
>
>DHSinclair wrote:
>>What is a reasonable partition size for WinXP?
>>I ask this because I have watched both W2K and WinXP getting close to 
>>outgrowing the 4GB partitions they live on (here) ATM.
>>
>>Yes, there may be much junk that I have not yet found/killed on either that 
>>might mitigate this question.
>>I do keep all %temp%, temp, and tmp directories at 'empty' as best I can.  I 
>>do use eraser to clear unused space also.  Still, I find the OS (and my 
>>stupidity) is expanding.  I did expect this; just not this fast.
>>Thank you,
>>Duncan
>>

-- 
Tallyho ! ]:8)
Taglines below !
--
My other computer is a Cadillac.

Reply via email to