JRS,
Well yes, but when I run the ViewSonic at its' NR, the stuff is just too
small and hard to read. I am not quite ready to start using the MS
Accessibility tools either......... LOL!
I have enjoyed 24 months of perfect video from the ViewSonic. I suspect
that as soon as my Sister finds out the ViewSonic is not in use, she will
claim it and stick it on her XP machine. (her current very old GEM GT-150TA
that I gave her is dying!) I've already tried to deflect this; I offered
her my NEC 15" panel. Still waiting......
Best,
Duncan
At 12:56 12/04/2008 -0800, you wrote:
I agree, use the native 1680x1050....
And BTW, Viewsonic says the VA721 is
"1280x1024 native resolution
Incredible image detail for sharp text and graphics."
I thought 1024x768 sounded low for a 17 inch panel.. :)
--
JRS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please remove **X** to reply...
Facts do not cease to exist just
because they are ignored.
----- Original Message ----
From: James Boswell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2008 12:42:42 PM
Subject: Re: [H] New 20" wide screen here!
You do realise that a panel with 1050 pixels on the vertical axis
won't actually be able to display 1200 pixels of height? if it'll even
take the signal it'll have to randomly lose detail from somewhere.
why not just output 1680x1050 (which is 16:10 btw, not 16:9) to it???
On 4 Dec 2008, at 20:22, DHSinclair wrote:
> I have been using a ViewSonic VA721 17" flat panel. I assume that
> its' aspect ratio is 4:3. I use it at a resolution of 1024x768
> (which is its' native resolution). It will do other higher
> resolutions also.
