FWIW mine showed 3.6 with a AMD MB but now shows 3.25 with a intel system. ( same ram) fp
At 10:59 AM 9/18/2009, Winterlight Poked the stick with: >This is not how I understand it to work, not that there seems to be any kind >of consensuses on this, but I read in Maximum PC that 32 bit supports 4GB of >RAM addressing. You start out with 4GB of RAM and then windows starts knocking >off for addresses already used by your video card, your network card, >whatever. This is why some people show 3.2GB some, just 3GB. To add to the >confusion, Maximum PC has reported that MS has stated that windows can >actually use some of that undressed RAM for things such as drivers. > > >At 07:24 AM 9/18/2009, you wrote: >>Hello Brian, >>32-bit is really locked to 3GB of RAM, it's just Windows is reporting the >>3.6GB of RAM. > > > > >__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature >database 4438 (20090918) __________ > >The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. > >http://www.eset.com > > -- Tallyho ! ]:8) Taglines below ! -- Who is the Grateful Dead, and why do they follow me?
