Hello all,

Man explaining it and reading the explanation can make your brain hurt.
Let's just say for the original poster it's not enough and should upgrade to
64-bit OS.

Regards,

Tim Lider
Sr. Data Recovery Specialist
Advanced Data Solutions, LLC
http://www.adv-data.com


> -----Original Message-----
> From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com [mailto:hardware-
> boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of Greg Sevart
> Sent: Friday, September 18, 2009 12:24 PM
> To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
> Subject: Re: [H] More than 4GB of ram and VM question
> 
> It isn't as much of a mystery as people make it out to be. By default,
> on a
> 32-bit system with 4GB of RAM, 2GB is available for user space, and 2GB
> is
> reserved for exclusive use by the kernel--which would include kernel
> mode
> drivers. You are also correct in that some of this upper space is
> reduced by
> various system devices, some of which might not make much sense. The
> reason
> that systems differ is because of varying chipsets, their maximum
> addressable memory, the ability of the chipset and BIOS to remap memory
> above system-reserved spaces, and, of course, the devices installed.
> 
> Using the /3GB switch will shift the division to 3GB of userland and
> 1GB of
> kernel memory, but keep in mind that each individual 32-bit address
> will
> still be limited to 2GB of memory unless it was compiled with
> LARGE_ADDRESS_AWARE. It gets much more complicated when you're using
> PAE
> (Physical Address Extensions) and AWE (Address Windowing Extensions),
> but
> that realm is only relevant if you're running Server Enterprise or
> better.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com [mailto:hardware-
> > boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of Winterlight
> > Sent: Friday, September 18, 2009 1:00 PM
> > To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
> > Subject: Re: [H] More than 4GB of ram and VM question
> >
> > This is not how I understand it to work, not that there seems to be
> > any kind of consensuses on this, but I read in Maximum PC that 32 bit
> > supports 4GB of RAM addressing. You start out with 4GB of RAM and
> > then windows starts knocking off for addresses already used by your
> > video card, your network card, whatever. This is why some people show
> > 3.2GB some, just 3GB. To add to the confusion, Maximum PC has
> > reported that MS has stated that windows can actually use some of
> > that undressed RAM for things such as drivers.
> >
> >
> > At 07:24 AM 9/18/2009, you wrote:
> > >Hello Brian,
> > >32-bit is really locked to 3GB of RAM, it's just Windows is
> reporting
> > the
> > >3.6GB of RAM.
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 


Reply via email to