What is it you are trying to do with the rules that you can't/couldn't? PFSense is a great product, I like it too.. then again, you can't get a monitoring complaince notice from them for your CC Company's/Banks who require it, so it's not an option for several.. (and if Clark is anemic, try Watchguard Firewalls which, IMHO, are worthless)
Surprisingly, I've found most of the rules I need to implement and content management pretty easy. Clark5 is a significant improvement, but even 4.3 addressed most of the needs I had. CW > -----Original Message----- > From: Greg Sevart <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Date: 11/04/09 06:13 > Subject: Re: [H] Unusual Active Directory Q > > What finally pushed me to try something else was that CC's firewall rules > were just so anemic. CC's firewall rules engine, even with > cc-advanced-firewall, doesn't offer much more than a Linksys. pfSense, on the > other hand, somehow reminds me of a CheckPoint every time I use it--and > that's a very good thing to me. :) > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] [mailto:hardware- > > [email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected] > > Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2009 11:00 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [H] Unusual Active Directory Q > > > > There are things I like about pfsense. However, as a paid product, the > > thing I like about clark is the ability to get system monitoring for > > credit card acceptance compliance statements... Which you can't get > > with pfsense. That, and tiered blacklist and filter groups to deny > > content to people or specific workstations. > >
