Me either. 785g and then a 5450 have been damn near perfect in my mediacenters, with no driver issue I can think of at all. Sent via BlackBerry
-----Original Message----- From: Zulfiqar Naushad <[email protected]> Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 21:49:30 To: [email protected]<[email protected]> Subject: Re: [H] Replacement Card - was Re: ATI CATALYST 10.2 & 10.3 Driver Preview - Final Thoughts and conclusions I don't know what you guys are ranting about but I have had no problems with catalyst drivers under windows 7. I do have a 4890 though. That may be the reason. Regards, Zulfiqar Naushad On Mar 3, 2010, at 9:40 PM, "Greg Sevart" <[email protected]> wrote: > My brother had a high-end Sapphire 1900 series card several years > back that > failed. They didn't have any more, and offered a substantially > inferior card > as a replacement. They wouldn't even let him pay the difference to > upgrade > to the next-best offering. > > I have a Sapphire 5770. The hardware is great, but I'm sorry, the > drivers > are absolute shit. I've ranted before on the issues I've had with the > drivers for this card, so I won't go in to it again. > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto:hardware- >> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Stan Zaske >> Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 9:05 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [H] Replacement Card - was Re: ATI CATALYST 10.2 & 10.3 >> Driver Preview - Final Thoughts and conclusions >> >> My experience with Sapphire RMA process was very fast. Guess it just >> depends.. >> >> >> On 3/3/2010 5:08 AM, Thane Sherrington wrote: >>> At 05:20 AM 3/3/2010, Anthony Q. Martin wrote: >>>> What card should I get to replace this HIS Radeon HD5770? Another >>>> brand of the same card? I can't deal with the crashing. >>> >>> I've had very good luck with Sapphire reliability wise, but the one >>> card I did have a bad fan on, it took forever to get replaced. >>> >>> T >>> >>> > > >
