All you really need to install is 3.5 to get 2.0, 3.0, and 3.5. 3.0 and 3.5
don't include a new CLR--they just extend the 2.0 CLR. That means that they
must install all the previous versions back to 2.0 to operate.

4.0 is a whole new CLR and the installer only includes that version.

1.1 can probably be left off any new builds. There are a few legacy apps
that still require it, but they're pretty rare now.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:hardware-
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Bobby Heid
> Sent: Friday, August 06, 2010 9:55 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [H] MS dot-NET
> 
> I love .Net!  The positives are that it allows you to do so much with so
little
> code.
> 
> As for a rebuild, I usually put 2.0, 3.0, 3.5, and 4.0.  Not a lot of
stuff uses 1.1
> that I have come across.  Windows update will put all of those on, I
think.
> 
> Bobby
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of DSinc
> Sent: Friday, August 06, 2010 9:16 PM
> To: Hardware Group
> Subject: [H] MS dot-NET
> 
> Some months back our collective convinced me that MS DOT-NET was
> painless and may be beneficial in the future.
> OK. I bit. I run it on 3 clients. It is here. It runs (I hope?). Still do
not see any
> positive or negative effect......................until...........
> I rebuild a machine from scratch.
> 
> I have DOt-NET v3.5 sp1 on running clients.
> I tried the optional v4 DOT-NET during last month's updates. It
> bombed/failed.
> Fine. I can stay at 3.5sp1.
> I've read to being blind about DOT-NET. Yes, I have mostly RTFM!
> 
> On a new install should I optionally install the OLD v1.1 DOT-NET base to
start
> the game again????
> Then I will just let MS Update do what MS Update does......... :) Best,
Duncan
> 



Reply via email to